Emily R. Langdon
402.978.5386elangdon@fraserstryker.com email Emily
In general, the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”) and the Internal Revenue Code (“IRC”) do not permit a participant to assign or alienate the participant’s interest in a retirement plan to another person. These “anti-assignment and alienation” rules are meant to ensure that a participant’s retirement benefits are actually available to provide financial support during the participant’s retirement years. A limited exception to the anti-assignment and alienation rules is provided for assignments of retirement benefits through qualified domestic relations orders (“QDROs”).
Under the QDRO exception, a DRO may assign some or all of a participant’s retirement benefits to a spouse, former spouse, child, or other dependent to satisfy family support or marital property obligations if and only if the order is a QDRO. ERISA requires that each retirement plan pay benefits in accordance with the applicable requirements of any QDRO that has been submitted to the plan administrator. Thus, a plan administrator’s determination on whether a DRO constitutes a QDRO has significant implications for both the parties to a domestic relations proceeding and the retirement plan.
A QDRO is:
To be recognized as a QDRO, an order must be a DRO. A DRO is:
Under ERISA, a state authority must actually issue a judgment, order, or decree or otherwise formally approve a property settlement agreement before it can be a DRO. The fact that a property settlement is agreed to and executed by the parties will not cause the agreement to be a DRO.
A DRO can only be a QDRO if it creates or recognizes the existence of an alternate payee’s right to receive, or assigns to an alternate payee the right to receive, all or a part of a participant’s benefits.
For purposes of the QDRO provisions, an alternate payee cannot be anyone other than a spouse, former spouse, child, or other dependent of a participant.
QDROs must contain all of the following information:
The Plan Administrator―usually the employer―is responsible for determining whether a DRO is a QDRO. In many instances, employers have their employee benefits attorney prepare an opinion letter determining whether or not a proposed DRO constitutes a QDRO.
Plan administrators have specific responsibilities and duties with respect to determining whether a domestic relations order is a QDRO. Plan administrators―as plan fiduciaries―are required to discharge their duties prudently and solely in the interest of plan participants and beneficiaries. Plan Administrators must establish reasonable procedures to determine the qualified status of domestic relations orders and to administer distributions pursuant to qualified orders. Plan Administrators are required to follow the plan’s procedures for making QDRO determinations.
In addition, Plan Administrators are required to furnish notice to participants and alternate payees of the receipt of a domestic relations order and to provide a copy of the plan’s procedures for determining the qualified status of such orders.
In many cases, legal counsel prepares QDRO Policies and Procedures for the Plan Administrator to follow, as well as Sample QDROs to provide for plan participants and their attorneys.
The “Plan Administrator” of an employee benefit plan is the individual or entity specifically designated in the plan documents as the administrator. If the plan documents do not designate an administrator, the administrator is the employer maintaining the plan.
Upon receipt of a DRO, the Plan Administrator is required to promptly notify the affected participant and each alternate payee named in the order of the receipt of the order and to provide a copy of the plan’s procedures for determining whether a domestic relations order is a QDRO. Notification should be sent to the address included in the domestic relations order.
The Plan Administrator is required to determine whether the order is a QDRO within a reasonable period of time after receipt of the DRO and to promptly notify the participant and each alternate payee of such determination.
Yes. Every retirement plan is required to establish written procedures for determining whether DROs are QDROs and for administering distributions under QDROs.
The QDRO procedures must:
Yes. The DOL has made clear that a plan’s QDRO procedures should be designed to ensure that QDRO determinations are made in a timely, efficient, and cost-effective manner, consistent with the Plan Administrator’s fiduciary duties under ERISA. Specifically, there must be a clear explanation of the plan’s determination process, including:
The DOL takes the position that the Plan Administrator’s adoption and use of clear QDRO procedures, coupled with the Plan Administrator’s provision of information about the plan and benefits upon request, will significantly reduce the difficulty and expense of obtaining and administering QDROs by minimizing confusion and uncertainty about the process.
Yes―but only in the context of a defined contribution plan. Specifically, a Plan Administrator may assess reasonable expenses attributable to a QDRO determination against the individual account of the participant who is a party to the DRO. The documents of the plan should be reviewed to determine how plan expenses are allocated.
Yes. While a Plan Administrator is not required to provide model QDRO forms, such forms can be very helpful for the parties and may reduce the time and/or expenses associated with a Plan Administrator’s determination of the qualified status of an order.
A Plan Administrator is required to honor any DRO that satisfies the requirements of a QDRO. Thus, a plan may not condition its determinations of QDRO status on the use of any particular form.
In general, a Plan Administrator must determine whether a DRO is a QDRO within a reasonable period of time after receiving the order. What is a reasonable period will depend on the specific circumstances. For instance, a DRO that is clear and complete when submitted should require less time to review than an order that is incomplete or unclear.
The Plan Administrator is required to notify the participant and each alternate payee of the Plan Administrator’s determination as to whether the DRO constitutes a QDRO. The notice should be in writing and furnished promptly following a determination.
In the case of a determination that a DRO is not a QDRO, the notice should include the reasons for the rejection. In most instances where there has been a reasonable good faith effort to prepare a QDRO, the parties should try to correct any deficiencies in the order and resubmit a corrected order for the Plan Administrator to review.
The notice of the Plan Administrator’s determination should be written in a manner that can be understood by the parties and clearly state:
A description of any additional material, information, or modifications necessary for the order to be a QDRO and an explanation of why such material, information, or modifications are necessary.
This article has been prepared for general information purposes and (1) does not create or constitute an attorney-client relationship, (2) is not intended as a solicitation, (3) is not intended to convey or constitute legal advice, and (4) is not a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified attorney. Always seek professional counsel prior to taking action.
Who We Service